We investigate the form of the one-point probability density function (pdf) for the density field of the interstellar medium using numerical simulations that successively reduce the number of physical processes included. Two-dimensional simulations of self-gravitating supersonic MHD turbulence, of supersonic self-gravitating hydrodynamic turbulence, and of decaying Burgers turbulence produce in all cases filamentary density structures and evidence for a power-law density pdf at large densities with logarithmic slope between -1.7 and -2.3. This suggests that a power-law shape of the pdf and the general filamentary morphology are the signature of the nonlinear advection operator. These results do not support previous claims that the pdf is lognormal. A series of one-dimensional simulations of forced supersonic polytropic turbulence is used to resolve the discrepancy. They suggest that the pdf is lognormal only for effective polytropic indices γ = 1 (or nearly lognormal for γ ≠ 1 if the Mach number is sufficiently small), while power laws develop for densities larger than the mean if γ < 1. We evaluate the polytropic index for conditions relevant to the cool interstellar medium using published cooling functions and different heating sources, finding that a lognormal pdf should probably occur at densities around 10 3 and is possible at larger densities, depending strongly on the role of gas-grain heating and cooling. Several applications are examined. First, we question a recent derivation of the initial mass function from the density pdf by Padoan, Nordlund, & Jones because (1) the pdf does not contain spatial information and (2) their derivation produces the most massive stars in the voids of the density distribution. Second, we illustrate how a distribution of ambient densities can alter the predicted form of the size distribution of expanding shells. Finally, a brief comparison is made with the density pdfs found in cosmological simulations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scalo et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: