The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of CT angiography for steno-occlusive diseases before and after interventional procedures, focusing on the role of multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) and source images. 17 patients with 20 steno-occlusive lesions underwent CT angiography before and after interventional procedures. For each lesion, the percentage stenosis obtained on CT angiography was compared with that on conventional angiography. In addition, MPR and source images were evaluated for the presence of wall thickening and calcification before interventional procedures, and the presence of dissection and luminal shape after interventional procedures. These findings were compared with those of conventional angiography. Although the percentage stenosis depicted on CT angiography correlated well with that on conventional angiography, MPR and source images clearly demonstrated the effect of intervention and the residual stenosis. MPR and source images clearly depicted wall thickening, wall calcification, the presence of dissection and the luminal shape. CT angiography provides useful information before intervention, while MPR and source images are of value in evaluating arterial wall abnormalities and morphological changes associated with interventional procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sugahara et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: