Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Stress-induced microstructural and interfacial changes are widely implicated in the electrical instability of memristive devices, yet they are rarely quantified within a single leakage-aware predictive framework. Here we present a proof-of-concept small-data study that integrates registered pre- and post-stress SEM differencing, DC current–voltage hysteresis descriptors, and illumination-sensitive electrochemical impedance spectroscopy features to predict a device-level electrical instability proxy. All analyses are performed using strict device- and batch-aware grouping to prevent cross-device leakage and to evaluate cross-batch generalization. Multimodal fusion improves predictive performance relative to single-modality baselines under device-grouped validation, whereas leave-one-batch-out analysis reveals heterogeneous transfer across fabrication batches. Grouped permutation testing and bootstrap uncertainty estimates support a modest average cross-batch benefit while highlighting substantial fabrication-dependent domain shift. Feature attribution identifies complementary predictive signals across modalities: SEM texture and Fourier descriptors summarize stress-associated image changes, DC metrics capture switching asymmetry, and impedance phase features reflect illumination-sensitive interfacial response. These attributions are interpreted as physically motivated, hypothesis-generating indicators rather than direct evidence of unique causal mechanisms. Together, these results establish a reproducible workflow for instability-oriented screening and batch-level process assessment in memristive materials, while defining a small-data benchmark for future validation against direct reliability endpoints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zamankhani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: