Using Chomsky's notion of the manufacture of consent as well as Said's critiques of Orientalism and culture and imperialism, this article presents a theory and way of looking at post September 11 discourse in United States media as a hegemonic, state-oriented manufacturing of nationalism. Story and memory, images, words and icons, ritual, spectacle, advertising, and commercialism are deployed subliminally to construct self-serving nationalist mythologies. These grand narratives of nationalism evoke meanings and ideologies, which produce an us/them nationalist discourse that demonizes and dehumanizes the other. The US[A]/ THEM discourse deflects attention elsewhere from key critical and moral issues raised by the United States war against terrorism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shehla Burney (2002) studied this question.