Key result
Priming platelets with adenosine dose-dependently suppressed the fraction of fully activated platelets, whereas succinate and coagulated plasma increased this fraction.
Why the study?
Platelets from healthy donors show heterogeneous agonist responsiveness modulated by priming molecules, and elevated priming substances and hypercoagulability occur in ischaemic heart disease.
Does priming with adenosine or succinate alter agonist-induced platelet activation profiles and population distribution in healthy donor platelets?
Does priming with adenosine or succinate alter agonist-induced platelet activation profiles and population distribution in healthy donor platelets?
Advanced flow cytometric clustering reveals that platelet priming with adenosine or succinate modulates the distribution of fully activated and resting platelet populations, while specific intermediate activation states remain constant.
May refine platelet priming assessment in ischaemic heart disease; leaves open clinical relevance pending validation.
Platelets from healthy donors display heterogeneity in responsiveness to agonists. The response thresholds of platelets are controlled by multiple bioactive molecules, acting as negatively or positively priming substances. Higher circulating levels of priming substances adenosine and succinate, as well as the occurrence of hypercoagulability, have been described for patients with ischaemic heart disease. Here, we present an improved methodology of flow cytometric analyses of platelet activation and the characterisation of platelet populations following activation and priming by automated clustering analysis. Platelets were treated with adenosine, succinate, or coagulated plasma before stimulation with CRP-XL, 2-MeSADP, or TRAP6 and labelled for activated integrin αIIbβ3 (PAC1), CD62P, TLT1, CD63, and GPIX. The Super-Enhanced Dmax subtraction algorithm and 2% marker (quadrant) setting were applied to identify populations, which were further defined by state-of-the-art clustering techniques (tSNE, FlowSOM). Following activation, five platelet populations were identified: resting, aggregating (PAC1 + ), secreting (α- and dense-granules; CD62P + , TLT1 + , CD63 + ), aggregating plus α-granule secreting (PAC1 + , CD62P + , TLT1 + ), and fully active platelet populations. The type of agonist determined the distribution of platelet populations. Adenosine in a dose-dependent way suppressed the fraction of fully activated platelets (TRAP6 > 2-MeSADP > CRP-XL), whereas succinate and coagulated plasma increased this fraction (CRP-XL > TRAP6 > 2-MeSADP). Interestingly, a subset of platelets showed a constant response (aggregating, secreting, or aggregating plus α-granule secreting), which was hardly affected by the stimulus strength or priming substances.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Veninga et al. (2021) studied Healthy volunteers (platelet analysis). Platelet priming with adenosine, succinate, or coagulated plasma vs. Vehicle or unprimed platelets was evaluated on Distribution of platelet populations (resting, aggregating, secreting, aggregating plus secreting, fully active). Priming platelets with adenosine dose-dependently suppressed the fraction of fully activated platelets, whereas succinate and coagulated plasma increased this fraction.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: