Why the study?
Does atrial pacing improve hemodynamics in a patient with acute diaphragmatic myocardial infarction, right ventricular infarction, and sinus arrest?
Does atrial pacing improve hemodynamics in a patient with acute diaphragmatic myocardial infarction, right ventricular infarction, and sinus arrest?
Atrial contraction is important for maintaining ventricular function in acute right ventricular infarction, and atrial pacing may provide significant hemodynamic benefit in such patients with conduction defects.
Atrial pacing may aid hemodynamics in acute RV infarction with sinus arrest; leaves open superiority over ventricular pacing in controlled studies.
Sinus arrest occurred in a patient with acute diaphragmatic myocardial infarction associated with right ventricular infarction. Cardiac output fell dramatically despite maintenance of a junctional rate of 72. Ventricular pacing at rate 82 and dopamine administration resulted in only slight hemodynamic improvement. Atrial pacing at rate 84 restored normal cardiac output until resumption of sinus node activity. These results suggest that atrial contraction is important for the maintenance of ventricular function in some patients with acute infarction, and may be of particular importance in the presence of right ventricular infarction. Temporary atrial or atrioventricular sequential pacing may be of great hemodynamic benefit in selected patients with conduction defects complicating myocardial infarction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burks et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: