Key result
Psychosocial risk profiles 1 and 2 were associated with fewer traumatic injuries compared to profile 3 among competitive soccer players over a three-month period.
Why the study?
To identify risk profiles based on psychosocial factors from the stress and athletic injury model and examine differences in injury frequency across these profiles to aid injury prevention strategies.
Do different psychosocial risk profiles predict the frequency of traumatic injuries in competitive soccer players?
Cohort (n=117)
Yes
Do different psychosocial risk profiles predict the frequency of traumatic injuries in competitive soccer players?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Different psychosocial risk profiles, characterized by varying levels of stress, anxiety, and coping strategies, can predict the risk of traumatic injuries in competitive soccer players.
The creation of risk profiles using the model of stress and athletic injury (J Appl Sport Psychol. 1998;10(1):5) represents a proposed shift from the reductionism paradigm to the complex sport approach in an attempt to formulate prevention strategies to combat the increasing number of injuries being reported in sporting populations. As a result, the primary purpose of this study was to: (a) identify different risk profiles based on psychosocial factors associated with the Williams and Andersen's model of stress and athletic injury model; and (b) examine potential differences in the frequency of injuries across these risk profiles. A prospective research design was utilized with a sample of 117 competitive soccer players (81 males and 36 females) from Sweden and the United States of America. Data was collected at two time points over the course of three months. At time 1 (beginning of the season) - a demographic information sheet, the Life Event Survey for Collegiate Athletes (LESCA), Sport Competitive Anxiety Test (SCAT), and Brief Cope were administered. At time two (T2), three months after the initial data collection, participants' traumatic injuries were recorded. Latent profile analysis (LPA) showed that 3 profiles solution showed best fit to data. Players in profile 1 and 2 reported fewer injuries compared to players in profile 3. However, whereas individuals in profile 1 had a lower predictive risk of sustaining an injury when compared to those in profile 3, both profiles had similar anxiety levels and use of coping strategies with differing stress levels. These findings suggest that the interaction between different proposed risk factors might influence injury risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clement et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Injury risk in competitive soccer players (n=117). Psychosocial risk profiles (Profile 1 and 2) vs. Profile 3 was evaluated on Traumatic injuries. Psychosocial risk profiles 1 and 2 were associated with fewer traumatic injuries compared to profile 3 among competitive soccer players over a three-month period.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: