Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
There is little information available on the performance of UK managers on the 16PF when administered as part of a selection procedure. The present paper reports the results of analyses of data from 1796 short‐listed managers who were given the 16PF (Form A). The assessment was part of a selection procedure carried out for a wide range of clients by an executive recruitment agency. Normative analyses of these data are presented and effects related to age and gender are examined. Internal consistencies of both primary and secondary scales are presented and the problem of low primary reliabilities is discussed. Factor analysis of the primary scale scores produced five second‐order factors which closely match the 16PF second‐order factor scales.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dave Bartram (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: