This paper examines the prevailing assumption that the dual-career family is the vanguard of new and more symmetrical forms of work and family integration. We argue that careers and families have been integrated in the past by a sex-role division of labor that compensated for men's career involvement with women's confinement to the home; that dual careers are a historically-specific variation of the “idle wife” pattern; and that careerism in the future is likely to become associated with non-parenting rather than symmetrical families. This, we anticipate, will involve a growing polarization of career-centered and family-centered lifestyles and a widening gap between the two in standard of living. Finally, we conclude that the type of family policy needed to reduce this polarization must recognize the family as more than a personal lifestyle option. It must promote and protect the family unit as the nurturer of values and qualities essential for humane societies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hunt et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: