Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Treatment and prognosis of lymphoma depend on accurate staging and evaluation. Relapsed Lymphomas represent great problem in accurate quick diagnosis that imply appropriate treatment. Aim of the work: To evaluate diagnostic utility of 18F-FDG PECT/CT in assessment of treatment response and identification of disease relapse. Patients and Methods: This prospective study were conducted on 49 consecutive patients with histologically verified lymphoma. They were 27/49 (55.1%) male and 22/49 (44.9%) female aged 37.83±2.29. All patients were subjected to pretreatment as well a follow up clinical, laboratory, CT PET-CT. PET-CT findings were classified as positive and negative according to remission status and relapse. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of PET- CT in assessment of the remission status and relapse were calculated and to be confirmed by open or laparoscopic biopsy. Results: PET-CT detected complete regression in 28 patients (57.14%), partial regression in 4 patients (8.16%), stationary course in 2 patients (4.08%), progression / relapse in 15 patients (30.61%). According to PET/CT 9 (23%) patients were true positive, 25 (65%) were true negative and 5 (13%) were false negative with sensitivity, specificity, positive p predictive value and negative predictive value of 95% and 91%, 90% and 98%, respectively. Conclusion: Our results confirm FDG-PET as a valid tool for assessment of treatment response and detection of relapsing lymphoma. We recommended further multicentric prospective studies that incorporates a larger number of patients should be implemented to define the exact relation between certain clinical, pathological, laboratory and PET factors and fate of the disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Omar et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: