Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents a fully corrected measurement of the energy-energy correlator (EEC) within jets in pp collisions. The EEC traces the energy flow as a highly energetic parton undergoes a QCD shower followed by the confinement of partons into hadrons, probing the correlation function of the energy flow inside jets. The EEC observable is measured as a function of the charged particle pair angular distance, <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:msub> <a:mi>R</a:mi> <a:mi mathvariant="normal">L</a:mi> </a:msub> </a:math> , for <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <d:mrow> <d:mn>20</d:mn> <d:mo><</d:mo> <d:msubsup> <d:mrow> <d:mi>p</d:mi> </d:mrow> <d:mrow> <d:mi mathvariant="normal">T</d:mi> </d:mrow> <d:mrow> <d:mi>ch</d:mi> <d:mtext> </d:mtext> <d:mi>jet</d:mi> </d:mrow> </d:msubsup> <d:mo><</d:mo> <d:mrow> <d:mn>80</d:mn> <d:mtext> </d:mtext> <d:mtext> </d:mtext> <d:mi>GeV</d:mi> <d:mo>/</d:mo> <d:mi>c</d:mi> </d:mrow> </d:mrow> </d:math> . In the perturbative region (large <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <g:msub> <g:mi>R</g:mi> <g:mi mathvariant="normal">L</g:mi> </g:msub> </g:math> ), a good agreement between the data and a next-to-leading-log perturbative QCD calculation is observed. In the nonperturbative region (small <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <j:msub> <j:mi>R</j:mi> <j:mi mathvariant="normal">L</j:mi> </j:msub> </j:math> ), the data exhibit a linear <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <m:msub> <m:mi>R</m:mi> <m:mi mathvariant="normal">L</m:mi> </m:msub> </m:math> dependence. There is a transition region in between, characterized by a turnover in the EEC distribution, indicating where hadronization effects begin to dominate. The peak of this transition region is located at <p:math xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <p:mn>2.43</p:mn> <p:mo>±</p:mo> <p:mn>0.14</p:mn> <p:mtext> </p:mtext> <p:mtext> </p:mtext> <p:mrow> <p:mi>GeV</p:mi> <p:mo>/</p:mo> <p:mi>c</p:mi> </p:mrow> <p:mo>/</p:mo> <p:mo stretchy="false">⟨</p:mo> <p:msubsup> <p:mi>p</p:mi> <p:mi mathvariant="normal">T</p:mi> <p:mrow> <p:mi>ch</p:mi> <p:mtext> </p:mtext> <p:mi>jet</p:mi> </p:mrow> </p:msubsup> <p:mo stretchy="false">⟩</p:mo> </p:math> for jets of various energies, indicating a common energy scale for the hadronization process. State-of-the-art Monte Carlo event generators are compared with the measurements, and can be used to constrain the parton shower and hadronization mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Acharya et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: