530 in COX-1 or Ser 516 in (The different numbers for similarly placed residues in the two isoforms is due to the longer N terminal sequence in COX-l; the numbering for COX-1 is thus about 14 in advance of that for COX-2.) Mutation of serine to alanine in either isoform altered neither Km nor PG production but did confer protection against the irreversi- ble inhibition caused by aspirin, since alanine cannot be acetylated. 29 However, mutation of serine to asparagine (isosteric with acetylated serine) has a strikingly differential effect; the COX-1 mutant lost cyclo-oxygenase activity whereas the COX-2 mutant retained full activity Cyclooxygenase-2 and its regulation in inflammation and an unchanged Km. Substitution with a larger not important in binding of substrate as marked amino acid, glutamine, abolished cyclo-oxygemutations at this site (Val to Lys or Glu) did not nase activity in both isoforms. 28'29 materially alter Km for AA of the COX-2 Another indication of the larger active site in protein. This compound irreversibly gested by the larger substrate binding site in inhibits the production of PGs by COX-1 or COX-2 had an unexpected outcome. It was COX-2 through the acetylation of Ser 530 or Ser argued that, as the acetylation of
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bakhle et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: