Why the study?
Does cilnidipine compared to telmisartan improve vascular damage in untreated hypertensive patients?
Does cilnidipine compared to telmisartan improve vascular damage in untreated hypertensive patients?
Both cilnidipine and telmisartan improve vascular damage markers like UAE and PWV in hypertensive patients, but cilnidipine uniquely reduces carotid intima-media thickness.
Supports cilnidipine preference for IMT reduction in hypertension; extends evidence for differential CCB versus ARB effects on vascular remodeling.
This study was designed to compare the effects of 12-month blood pressure (BP) control using cilnidipine and telmisartan on vascular damage in untreated hypertensive patients. One hundred patients were randomly assigned to either a cilnidipine group or a telmisartan group. The extent of vascular damage was assessed before and after treatment by measuring urinary albumin excretion (UAE), pulse wave velocity (PWV), and intima-media thickness (IMT) of the carotid arteries in each patient. Both drugs similarly decreased BP without altering plasma markers for oxidative stress or inflammation. Both UAE and PWV were significantly improved in both groups, but IMT was significantly reduced only in the cilnidipine group. Multiple regression analyses suggested that the UAE may have decreased as a result of a reduction in intraglomerular pressure caused by telmisartan or by efferent arteriolar dilation caused by cilnidipine. In addition, the PWV may have decreased as a result of the improvement in lipid metabolism caused by telmisartan or the reduction in plasma levels of aldosterone caused by cilnidipine. However, the analyses could not identify any definitive causal relationships or suggest the mechanism responsible for the improvement in IMT caused by cilnidipine. Thus, telmisartan and cilnidipine have unique properties for inhibiting vascular complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaneshiro et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: