Why the study?
Stent thrombosis carries high mortality and morbidity, and von Willebrand factor may play a role in thrombus formation at sites of critical coronary stenosis in STEMI.
Does caplacizumab improve clinical and angiographic outcomes in a patient with subacute stent thrombosis and high von Willebrand factor levels despite standard antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy?
Does caplacizumab improve clinical and angiographic outcomes in a patient with subacute stent thrombosis and high von Willebrand factor levels despite standard antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy?
Caplacizumab may represent an innovative and effective treatment approach for subacute stent thrombosis driven by high von Willebrand factor levels when standard antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapies fail.
Case suggests VWF role in subacute stent thrombosis after STEMI PCI; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Background Acute and subacute stent thromboses are a rare complication associated with high mortality and morbidity occurring in ∼1.5% of patients treated with primary percutaneous intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Recent publications describe a potential role of the von Willebrand factor (VWF) in thrombus formation at sites of critical coronary stenosis in STEMI. Case summary We describe a 58-year-old woman with STEMI at initial presentation, who suffered subacute stent thrombosis despite good stent expansion, efficacious dual antiplatelet therapy, and therapeutic anticoagulation. Because of very high VWF values, we administered N-acetylcysteine in order to depolymerize VWF, but the drug was not well tolerated. Since the patient was still symptomatic, we used caplacizumab in order to prevent VWF from interacting with platelets. Under this treatment, the clinical and angiographic course was favourable. Discussion Considering a modern view of intracoronary thrombus pathophysiology, we describe an innovative treatment approach, which eventually ended in a favourable outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stalder et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: