Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Joining metals by adhesive bonding is essential in widespread fields such as mobility, dentistry, and electronics. Although adhesive technology has grown since the 1920s, the roles of interfacial phenomena in adhesive bonding are still elusive, which hampers the on-demand selection of surface treatment and adhesive types. In the present study, we clarified how chemical interactions and mechanical interlocking governed adhesive bonding by evaluating adhesion properties at the interfaces between epoxy/amine adhesive and two kinds of Al adherends: a flat aluminum hydroxide (Al x O y H z ) and technical Al plate with roughness. Spectroscopic and microscopical data demonstrate that the protonation of the amino groups in an amine hardener converts Al(OH) 3 on the Al x O y H z surface to AlO(OH). The interfacial protonation results in an interfacial dipole layer with positive charges on the adhesive side, whose electrostatic interaction increases the interfacial fracture energy. The double cantilever beam tests for the flat Al x O y H z and technical Al substrates clarify that the mechanical interlocking originating from the surface roughness further increases the fracture energy. This study disentangles the roles of the chemical interactions and mechanical interlocking occurring at the epoxy adhesive/Al interface in the adhesion mechanism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akaike et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: