Letters3 May 2016Innovation in Analysis of Respiratory SoundsShinichiro Ohshimo, MD, PhD, Takuma Sadamori, MD, PhD, and Koichi Tanigawa, MD, PhDShinichiro Ohshimo, MD, PhDFrom Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, and Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan., Takuma Sadamori, MD, PhDFrom Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, and Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan., and Koichi Tanigawa, MD, PhDFrom Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, and Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.Author, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/L15-0350 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Background: Despite advances in technology, evaluation of respiratory physiology still depends primarily on chest auscultation. However, this method is subjective and requires sufficient training. In addition, identification of the 5 respiratory sounds specified by the International Lung Sounds Association is difficult because their frequencies overlap: The frequency of normal respiratory sound is 100 to 1000 Hz, wheeze is 100 to 5000 Hz, rhonchus is 150 Hz, coarse crackle is 350 Hz, and fine crackle is 650 Hz (1, 2).Objective: To develop a computer-assisted stethoscope to quickly and accurately identify respiratory sounds.Methods and Findings: We developed a stethoscope that ...References1. Bohadana A, Izbicki G, Kraman SS. Fundamentals of lung auscultation. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:744-51. [PMID: 24552321] doi:10.1056/NEJMra1302901 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2. Mikami R, Murao M, Cugell DW, Chretien J, Cole P, Meier-Sydow J, et al. International Symposium on Lung Sounds. Synopsis of proceedings. Chest. 1987;92:342-5. [PMID: 3508749] MedlineGoogle Scholar3. Nabiev R, Glazova A, Olyinik V, Makarenkova A, Makarenkov A, Rakhimov A, et al. Portable system for auscultation and lung sound analysis. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;196:290-3. [PMID: 24732524] MedlineGoogle Scholar4. Hoffmann C, Falzone E, Verret C, Pasquier P, Leclerc T, Donat N, et al. Brief report: pulmonary auscultation in the operating room: a prospective randomized blinded trial comparing electronic and conventional stethoscopes. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:646-8. [PMID: 23868885] doi:10.1213/ANE.0b013e31829ec0a5 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5. Gurung A, Scrafford CG, Tielsch JM, Levine OS, Checkley W. Computerized lung sound analysis as diagnostic aid for the detection of abnormal lung sounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir Med. 2011;105:1396-403. [PMID: 21676606] doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2011.05.007 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: From Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, and Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.Disclosures: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=L15-0350.This article was published at www.annals.org on 16 February 2016. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Metrics Cited byTechnical characterisation of digital stethoscopes: towards scalable artificial intelligence-based auscultationRelationship between shunt sounds at anastomotic sites and mean brachial artery blood flow and vascular resistance index according to Doppler ultrasoundRespiratory sound classification for crackles, wheezes, and rhonchi in the clinical field using deep learningNon-invasive devices for respiratory sound monitoringA machine-learning based approach to quantify fine crackles in the diagnosis of interstitial pneumoniaDesarrollo de una aplicación para configurar el teléfono inteligente como fonendoscopio para profesionales sanitarios con deficiencias auditivasCharacteristics of Pulmonary Auscultation in Patients with 2019 Novel Coronavirus in ChinaThe highs and lows of wheezing: A review of the most popular adventitious lung sound 3 May 2016Volume 164, Issue 9Page: 638-639KeywordsAlgorithmsChartsComputersDisclosureGastroenterology and hepatologyIntensive care unitsLungsMedical educationRespiratory physiologyThorax ePublished: 16 February 2016 Issue Published: 3 May 2016 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2016 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ohshimo et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: