Why the study?
The efficacy and safety of edoxaban compared to warfarin stratified by CHA2DS2VASc scores had not been described.
Does once-daily edoxaban reduce stroke or systemic embolism compared to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation across different CHA2DS2VASc scores?
Does once-daily edoxaban reduce stroke or systemic embolism compared to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation across different CHA2DS2VASc scores?
Edoxaban maintains its relative efficacy and safety benefits over warfarin across all CHA2DS2VASc scores in patients with atrial fibrillation, providing incrementally larger absolute risk reductions in higher-risk patients.
Edoxaban's efficacy and safety versus warfarin hold across CHA2DS2-VASc strata; reinforces consistent use independent of baseline stroke risk.
The efficacy and safety of the oral factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban compared to warfarin stratified by CHA2DS2VASc scores have not been described. The ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial randomized patients with atrial fibrillation to once-daily edoxaban or warfarin. We classified patients based on CHA2DS2VASc score and compared pharmacokinetics (edoxaban concentration), pharmacodynamics (anti-factor Xa [FXa] with edoxaban, time-in-therapeutic range for warfarin), efficacy (stroke or systemic embolism [SSE]), safety (major bleeding [MB], intracranial hemorrhage), and cardiovascular mortality, for the approved edoxaban regimen vs warfarin. The distribution CHA2DS2VASc score were:≤3, N = 4159 (29.6%); 4, N = 4066 (28.9%); 5, N = 3165 (22.5%); and ≥6, N = 2681 (19.1%). Increasing rates of SSE (1.05 to 2.99%/year) and MB (2.27 to 4.66%/year) were observed in the warfarin arm as the CHA2DS2VASc score increased. The hazard ratios per unit increase of CHA2DS2VASc score were 1.29 (1.21-1.38) and 1.26 (1.17-1.36) for SSE, and 1.20 (1.13-1.27) and 1.19 (1.12-1.27) for MB, with warfarin and edoxaban, respectively. Time-in-therapeutic range in warfarin-treated patients was similar and high (median 68%-69%) across CHA2DS2VASc scores, whereas edoxaban trough concentration, exogenous anti-FXa activity and %inhibition of endogenous FXa were higher at increasing CHA2DS2VASc scores. Edoxaban reduced SSE, MB, intracranial hemorrhage, and cardiovascular mortality vs warfarin to a similar degree across the range of CHA2DS2VASc scores (P-int = 0.90, 0.96, 0.21, and 0.37, respectively). Because of higher event rates the number of events prevented with edoxaban tended to be greater in patients with higher CHA2DS2VASc scores. The benefit and safety of edoxaban versus warfarin is maintained across CHA2DS2VASc scores. While the relative risk reductions remain similar, edoxaban provides incrementally larger absolute reductions in outcomes over warfarin in patients with higher CHA2DS2VASc scores.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Groot et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: