Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) is promoted in Ethiopia to strengthen productivity, resilience, and food security, yet adoption remains uneven across regions and gender groups. This study examined gendered barriers to CSA adoption and assessed policy responsiveness using primary survey data from 400 randomly selected households in the Oromia, Central Ethiopia, and Somali regions, alongside a structured policy review. Descriptive statistics, binary and count models, practice-specific probit models, and multivariable analyses were applied. Selected CSA practices were also examined as nature-based solutions (NbS). The results revealed that the impact of extension visits on CSA adoption was 13.4% and that of climate data was 14.9% (p < 0.01). The main constraints include water scarcity (mean = 3.76), lack of finance (3.19), unsuitability of program design for farmers (3.15), high input costs (3.13), and poor training (3.00). Female-headed households face more constraints related to labor, tenure, training, and unsuitable program design. Resilience scores of CSA adopters were 12.93 more than those of non-adopters. Adoption reduces the chances of food shortage to an odds ratio (OR) of 0.364 (p < 0.01). However, adoption was not significantly associated with women's inclusion. This shows that CSA enhances resilience and food security but does not automatically enhance women's empowerment. It means that Ethiopia needs gender-responsive and regionally specific services in extension, finance, training, tenure, and labor-saving practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maru et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: