Why the study?
Does clopidogrel plus aspirin improve postoperative ejection fraction and wall motion score index compared to warfarin plus aspirin in patients undergoing CABG with coronary endarterectomy?
Does clopidogrel plus aspirin improve postoperative ejection fraction and wall motion score index compared to warfarin plus aspirin in patients undergoing CABG with coronary endarterectomy?
Clopidogrel plus aspirin may be a preferable alternative to warfarin plus aspirin following CABG with coronary endarterectomy, offering improved wall motion scores without the need for routine INR monitoring.
BACKGROUND: Since there is a lack of research on postoperative anticoagulation protocol in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) / coronary endarterectomy (CE), we recommend a new protocol for anticoagulation in these patients. METHODS: In this double-blind randomized clinical trial study, 52 patients undergoing CABG / CE entered the study and were divided into two groups. In group 1, the patients were given warfarin(international normalized ratio (INR) between 2-3) together with 80 mg aspirin daily for 3 months. In group 2, the patients were given 75 mg plavix daily together with 80 mg aspirin daily for 3 months. We evaluated patients with electrocardiography, echocardiography and checking ceratin phosphokinase MB and troponin I in the several stages. The data were analysed SPSS Version18 software. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between pre and post-operative Ejection fraction in patients with plavix (P=0.21) and warfarin (P=0.316) regimen. However, wall mrotion score was significantly better in clopidogrel - aspirin patients in late (3 months) post operation (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Since warfarin has serious hemorrhagic complications and requires closed monitoring of serum drug activity by serial INR checking, it is recommended that clopidogrel - aspirin can be the preferred alternative anticoagulation therapy in CABG / CE patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vafaey et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: