Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Biotic causes of changes in palaeorecords are discussed as a counterbalance to the (over) emphasis on climatic drivers in the interpretation of palaeoecological change. Biotic and climatic drivers are considered as competing hypotheses with particular reference to the importance of early-Holocene drought in the northern central grassland region of North America. It is concluded that the observed patterns are explained better by grazers than by the direct effects of climatic variation. The elevation of biotic factors as competing hypotheses with climate will require new conceptual and methodological approaches to palaeoecology in North America.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Craine et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: