Total viable counts, proteolytic, ureolytic, cellulolytic and NH + 4 utilizing anaerobic bacteria in caecal contents, soft and hard faeces of rabbits were studied. No significant differences between the bacterial counts from the caecum and soft faeces were observed ( P < 0·05) but there were significant differences between the bacterial counts of the soft and hard faeces ( P < 0·01).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Emaldi et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: