Why the study?
Does primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy reduce sudden cardiac death and all-cause mortality in Asian patients with cardiomyopathy, and what factors drive its underutilization in Asia?
Does primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy reduce sudden cardiac death and all-cause mortality in Asian patients with cardiomyopathy, and what factors drive its underutilization in Asia?
This editorial highlights that while primary prevention ICDs remain effective for reducing sudden cardiac death in Asian patients with cardiomyopathy, profound regional disparities, socioeconomic barriers, and evolving medical therapies necessitate better risk stratification and Asian-specific cohort data.
[Figure: see text]
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lau et al. (2023) conducted an editorial in Risk of sudden cardiac death in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention vs. Optimal medical therapy was evaluated on Sudden cardiac death and all-cause mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: