Key result
Insulin peglispro matches glargine for hepatic glucose suppression but stimulates less peripheral glucose disposal.
RCT (n=8)
Open-label
Four-period, incomplete-block, crossover
No
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the endogenous glucose production (EGP) and glucose disposal rate (GDR) over a range of doses of basal insulin peglispro (BIL) and insulin glargine in healthy subjects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a single-center, randomized, open-label, four-period, incomplete-block, crossover study conducted in eight healthy male subjects. Subjects had 8-h euglycemic clamps performed with primed, continuous infusions of BIL (5.1 to 74.1 mU/min) in three dosing periods and insulin glargine (20 or 30 mU/m(2)/min) in a fourth period, targeted to achieve 50-100% suppression of EGP. D-[3-(3)H] glucose was infused to assess rates of glucose appearance and disappearance. RESULTS: Mean BIL and insulin glargine concentrations (targeted to reflect the differences in intrinsic affinities of the two basal insulins) ranged from 824 to 11,400 and 212 to 290 pmol/L, respectively, and increased accordingly with increases in dose. Suppression of EGP and stimulation of GDR were observed with increasing concentrations of both insulins. At insulin concentrations where EGP was significantly suppressed, insulin glargine resulted in increased GDR. In contrast, at comparable suppression of EGP, BIL had minimal effect on GDR at lower doses and had substantially less effect on GDR than insulin glargine at higher doses. CONCLUSIONS: The novel basal insulin analog BIL has relative hepatopreferential action and decreased peripheral action, compared with insulin glargine, in healthy subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henry et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Healthy subjects (n=8). Basal insulin peglispro (BIL) vs. Insulin glargine (20 or 30 mU/m2/min) was evaluated on Endogenous glucose production (EGP) suppression and glucose disposal rate (GDR) stimulation. Basal insulin peglispro (824-11,400 pmol/L) achieved comparable EGP suppression with less glucose disposal stimulation than insulin glargine (212-290 pmol/L) in 8 healthy males.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: