Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mycobacterium marinum is recognized as a cutaneous pathogen requiring antibiotic treatment. We compared the E-test with a reference agar dilution method for susceptibility testing of M. marinum to amikacin, ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin, doxycycline, rifampicin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and ethambutol. MICs obtained after 6 d showed agreement between the E-test and agar dilution within +/- 2 dilutions in 95% of all cases for amikacin, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline and rifampicin. Inhibitory concentrations of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were difficult to define using the E-test because of gradually decreased growth in the presence of increasing concentrations. For clarithromycin, results were generally 1-3 dilution steps lower with the E-test and for ethambutol they were often > 3 dilution steps lower. These differences always appeared in the low MIC range and did not affect the categorization of the strains as susceptible to these 2 antimicrobial agents. All strains were interpreted as susceptible to all tested antibiotics, except for doxycycline, according to recommended breakpoints. Overall, our results suggest that the E-test can be considered an alternative for susceptibility testing of certain antibacterial agents against M. marinum.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jim Werngren (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: