Why the study?
Heart rhythm disorders are common in family practice, but managing them is not always simple, efficient, or cost effective.
Does telecardiology improve diagnostic efficiency, clinical outcomes, and cost-effectiveness in patients with suspected cardiac rhythm disorders or acute myocardial infarction in primary care?
Does telecardiology improve diagnostic efficiency, clinical outcomes, and cost-effectiveness in patients with suspected cardiac rhythm disorders or acute myocardial infarction in primary care?
Telecardiology in primary care improves diagnostic speed, reduces unnecessary specialist referrals, and is cost-effective for managing patients with cardiovascular diseases like arrhythmias and acute myocardial infarction.
Telecardiology may shorten diagnosis-to-treatment time and reduce unnecessary referrals for HRD in family practice; leaves open need for prospective RCTs.
PURPOSE: Heart rhythm disorders (HRD) are often present in patients visiting their family physician (FP). Dealing with their problems is not always simple, efficient and cost effective. The aim of this paper is to review the existing literature about the use and experience of telecardiology in patients experiencing HRD. METHODS: We conducted a review of literature in PubMed biographical databases (MeSH thesaurus), Web of Science and Cochrane, between 1995 and 2019. We included original articles in English that describe the use of telecardiology at primary and secondary healthcare levels. Exclusion criteria are those publications that discuss heart failure or observation of the activity of pacemakers or defibrillators and the age of patients under 18 years. A total of 19 papers met the inclusion criteria, thirteen of them were original scientific articles and we included them in the analysis. RESULTS: Use of telemedicine can shorten the time from diagnosis to the necessary treatment (2/13), telemedicine can reduce mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (4/13), it can shorten the time to diagnose atrial fibrillations (4/13), it can help determine the diagnosis for patients complaining about heart rhythm disorders which were not detected on the standard ECG recording (2/13) and can also help identify cardiac causes for syncope or collapse (2/13). All studies have confirmed that the use of telecardiology significantly reduces the number of unnecessary referrals to a cardiologist or hospitalization, and shortens the time needed to treat patients with life-threatening conditions. CONCLUSION: The use of telecardiological techniques increases the quality and safety of work in managing patients with cardiovascular disease in FP practice. Usage of telecardiologic devices can also save money and bridge the gap between the primary and secondary healthcare levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vodička et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: