Why the study?
The study was conducted to compare the effects of a hybrid training system combined with cycle ergometry versus a volitional cycle ergometer on muscle strength, volume, aerobic functions, and lactate metabolism.
Does a hybrid training system combined with a cycle ergometer improve muscle strength, muscle volume, aerobic functions, and lactate metabolism in healthy males compared to a volitional cycle ergometer?
Does a hybrid training system combined with a cycle ergometer improve muscle strength, muscle volume, aerobic functions, and lactate metabolism in healthy males compared to a volitional cycle ergometer?
Combining electrical stimulation of antagonist muscles with cycling exercise improves muscle strength, mass, and aerobic function more effectively than conventional cycling in healthy males.
HCE may differentially affect lactate metabolism versus VCE in healthy young men; leaves open clinical utility and requires randomized confirmation.
A hybrid training system (HTS) combining antagonist muscle electrical stimulation and voluntary muscle contraction has been developed using eccentric antagonist muscle contractions with electrical stimulation as resistance to voluntary muscle contractions. We devised an exercise method using HTS combined with a cycle ergometer (HCE). The purpose of this study was to compare the muscle strength, muscle volume, aerobic functions and lactate metabolism of HCE and a volitional cycle ergometer (VCE). A total of 14 male participants performed exercise on a bicycle ergometer for 30 min per session, 3 times per week for 6 weeks. We divided 14 participants into an HCE group (7 participants) and a VCE group (7 participants). The workload was set at 40% of each participant’s peak oxygen uptake (V.O2peak). Electrodes were placed over each motor point on the quadriceps and hamstrings. The V.O2peak and anaerobic threshold significantly increased before and after training when using HCE rather than VCE. The HCE group had significantly increased extension and flexion muscle strength at 180 degrees/s in post-training measurements over pre-training measurements. Knee flexion muscle strength at 180 degrees/s tended to increase in the HCE group compared to the VCE group. The quadricep muscle cross-sectional area was significantly increased in the HCE group compared to the VCE group. Additionally, the HCE group had significantly decreased maximal lactate, measured every 5 min during exercise at the end of study, between pre and post-training. Thus, HCE may be a more effective training method for muscle strength, muscle mass and aerobic functions at 40% of each participant’s V.O2peak than conventional cycling exercise. HCE could be applied not only as aerobic exercise but also as resistance training.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Omoto et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: