Key result
cRGD-loaded stents reduce neointimal area ~42% vs polymer stents at 12 weeks in pigs.
Why the study?
Does a cRGD-coated stent reduce neointimal hyperplasia compared to bare metal or polymer stents in a porcine coronary artery model?
Population
Porcine coronary arteries and in vitro endothelial progenitor cells
Comparison
Guidant Tetra stents with a durable polymer… vs Unloaded polymer stents and bare metal stents
Design
Preclinical
Follow-up
12 weeks
Authors
Loading...
Stent coating with cRGD reduces in-stent restenosis in a porcine model by accelerating endothelialization.
Does a cRGD-coated stent reduce neointimal hyperplasia compared to bare metal or polymer stents in a porcine coronary artery model?
Absolute Event Rate: 2.2% vs 3.8%
p-value: p=0.010
Stent coating with cRGD reduces in-stent restenosis in a porcine model by accelerating endothelialization.
Blindt et al. (2006) studied Coronary neointima formation (n=36). cRGD-loaded polymer stent vs. Unloaded polymer stents and bare metal stents was evaluated on Neointimal area at 12 weeks (p=0.010). At 12 weeks, cRGD-loaded stents significantly reduced neointimal area (2.2 vs 3.8 mm2) and percent area stenosis (33% vs 54%) compared with polymer stents (p=0.010) in porcine coronary arteries.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: