Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: This study compared the effect of cognitive analytic therapy (CAT), a focused time-limited psychotherapy, and diabetes specialist nurse education (DSNE) in a controlled trial of 26 chronically poorly controlled adult type I patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to either 16 sessions of CAT (treatment) or 14-18 sessions of DSNE (control). Pre- and post-treatment blood glucose control (HbA1), interpersonal difficulties, and diabetes knowledge were measured before and up to 9 months after treatment was completed. RESULTS: Although HbA1 levels improved in the DSNE group, at the end of treatment (mean fall 1.2%, P = 0.004) this was not maintained; so by the 9-month follow-up, the overall net fall was limited to 0.9% (P = 0.03 vs. entry value). There were no significant improvements in interpersonal difficulties in DSNE subjects at any retest point (P > 0.05). In contrast, glycemic control and interpersonal difficulties both improved after CAT. In contrast to DSNE, this improvement continued so that at the 9-month follow-up visit, the changes were significant (mean fall in HbA1 = 2%, P = 0.002 and P = 0.03 for the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems [IIP] scores). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that although there is no statistical difference between CAT and DSNE, the effects of CAT produce a more prolonged effect on glycemic control. If psychological difficulties underlying problems with self-care in a type I population are addressed, then improvements in diabetes control are likely to continue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fosbury et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: