After cardiac ischemia and reperfusion or reoxygenation (I/R), damaged mitochondria propagate tissue injury by promoting cell death. One possible mechanism to protect from I/R-induced injury is the elimination of damaged mitochondria by mitophagy. Here we identify new molecular events that lead to mitophagy using a cell culture model and whole hearts subjected to I/R. We found that I/R induces glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) association with mitochondria and promotes direct uptake of damaged mitochondria into multiorganellar lysosomal-like (LL) structures for elimination independently of the macroautophagy pathway. We also found that protein kinase C δ (PKCδ) inhibits GAPDH-driven mitophagy by phosphorylating the mitochondrially associated GAPDH at threonine 246 following I/R. Phosphorylated GAPDH promotes the accumulation of mitochondria at the periphery of LL structures, which coincides with increased mitochondrial permeability. Either inhibition of PKCδ or expression of a phosphorylation-defective GAPDH mutant during I/R promotes a reduction in mitochondrial mass and apoptosis, thus indicating rescued mitophagy. Taken together, we identified a GAPDH/PKCδ signaling switch, which is activated during oxidative stress to regulate the balance between cell survival by mitophagy and cell death due to accumulation of damaged mitochondria. Background: How damaged mitochondria are removed by mitophagy is not fully described. Results: Ischemia and reoxygenation (I/R)-induced injury triggers mitochondria association of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and mitophagy, and protein kinase Cδ (PKCδ) activation inhibits it. Conclusion: PKCδ-mediated phosphorylation of GAPDH inhibits mitophagy. Significance: GAPDH/PKCδ is a signaling switch, which is activated during ischemic injury to regulate the balance between cell survival by mitophagy and cell death by apoptosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yogalingam et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: