Retrospective matched cohort study demonstrates improved survival following neoadjuvant intratumoral gene-mediated immunotherapy in resectable lung cancer, highlighting durable oncologic benefits.
Objectives Safety and immunologic priming using neoadjuvant, intratumoral gene-mediated cytotoxic immunotherapy (GMCI) has been established in a phase 1 clinical trial involving patients with resectable non−small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here we examine long-term clinical outcomes of this cohort and compare the results with a comparable contemporaneous control group. Methods We performed a retrospective review of a prospective database involving our trial cohort. We then identified comparable patients in a ratio of 5:1 considering pathologic stage, histology, resection extent, and age. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated. Differences in disease-free and overall survival were measured by log-rank test. Results Intratumoral GMCI was delivered to 12 patients with NSCLC by endobronchial ultrasound (n = 11) or video-assisted thoracic surgery (n = 1). Among patients receiving GMCI and control patients, more than 70% had stage II or stage III disease. Median follow-up for the surviving patients enrolled was 6.0 years (interquartile range, 5.2-6.7 years). Median diseases-free survival was significantly increased among patients receiving GMCI relative to control (2.4 years vs 1.0 year; P = .04). Median OS in the GMCI group was not reached (8 of 12 patients remain alive) versus 3.0 years in controls and was significant by log-rank at 2-7 years ( P = .013-.035). Conclusions Neoadjuvant immune stimulation induces local and systemic immune activation, is safe when combined with modern systemic therapies, and may confer long-term oncologic advantages. These data provide a foundation for additional trials exploring intratumoral immunotherapy for patients with NSCLC, especially in conjunction with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aicher et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: