Key result
Repetitive facilitation exercises improve post-stroke upper limb and hand function more than conventional rehabilitation.
OBJECTIVE: To study the effects on the hemiplegic upper limb of repetitive facilitation exercises (RFEs) using a novel facilitation technique, in which the patient's intention to move the hemiplegic upper limb or finger was followed by realization of the movement using multiple sensory stimulations. METHODS: Twenty-three stroke patients were enrolled in a cross-over study in which 2-week RFE sessions (100 repetitions each of five-to-eight types of facilitation exercise per day) were alternated with 2-week conventional rehabilitation (CR) sessions, for a total of four sessions. Treatments were begun with the 2-week RFE session in one group and the 2-week CR session in the second group. RESULTS: After the first 2-week RFE session, both groups showed improvements in the Brunnstrom stages of the upper limb and the hand, in contrast to the small improvements observed during the first CR session. The Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function (STEF) score, which evaluates the ability of manipulating objects, in both groups improved during both sessions. After the second 2-week RFE and CR sessions, both groups showed little further improvement except in the STEF score. CONCLUSION: The novel RFEs promoted the functional recovery of the hemiplegic upper limb and hand to a greater extent than the CR sessions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawahira et al. (2010) studied Stroke with hemiplegic upper limb and hand (n=23). Repetitive facilitation exercises (RFEs) vs. Conventional rehabilitation (CR) was evaluated on Brunnstrom stages of the upper limb and hand, and Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function (STEF) score. Repetitive facilitation exercises (100 repetitions of 5-8 exercises/day for 2-week sessions) improved upper limb and hand Brunnstrom stages more than conventional rehabilitation in 23 stroke patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: