Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Seemingly comfortable in my physical education teacher education (PETE) role as a critical pedagogue, I was abruptly jolted into considering post-paradigmatic possibilities through participation in a collaborative project that explored shifting conceptualisations of knowledge and learning in initial teacher education (ITE). The project sought to examine twenty-first-century changes in understandings of knowledge and learning and to consider the implications for curriculum and pedagogical practices in New Zealand schools and in ITE. In this paper, I provide a description of the ontological shifting process I encountered through participation in a self-study research project. I argue that twenty-first-century conceptualisations of knowledge and learning offer unique possibilities for physical education (PE) and PETE contexts. In particular, I critique varying sociocultural orientations to PE and PETE (humanistic, critical and postcritical) and consider the possibilities and limitations inherent within each approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Judy Bruce (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: