Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The synthesis of the first completely characterized transition-metal complex containing a sulfur-bound 4,6-dimethyldibenzothiophene (4,6-Me(2)DBT) ligand, [CpRu(CO)(2)(eta(1)(S)-4,6-Me(2)DBT)]BF(4) (1) (Cp = eta(5)-C(5)Me(5)), is reported. X-ray studies of 1 and its 4-methyldibenzothiophene and dibenzothiophene analogues, [CpRu(CO)(2)(eta(1)(S)-4-MeDBT)]BF(4) (2) and [CpRu(CO)(2)(eta(1)(S)-DBT)]BF(4) (3), show that the Ru-S bond distances increase in the order, 3 < 2 < 1. Equilibrium studies on the series of [CpRu(CO)(2)(eta(1)(S)-DBTh)](+) compounds, where DBTh = DBT, 4-MeDBT, 4,6-Me(2)DBT, and 2,8-Me(2)DBT, show that the relative binding strengths of the dibenzothiophene ligands increase in the order 4,6-Me(2)DBT (1) < 4-MeDBT (20.2(1)) < DBT (62.7(6)) < 2,8-Me(2)DBT (223(3)). These results are the first to quantify the steric effect of 4- and 6-methyl groups on the sulfur-coordinating ability of dibenzothiophenes to transition-metal centers. They are also consistent with the proposal that 4- and 6-methyl groups reduce the coordination of dibenzothiophenes to active metal sites on hydrodesulfurization catalysts, which could account for the slow rate of 4-MeDBT and 4,6-Me(2)DBT hydrodesulfurization in petroleum feedstocks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vecchi et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: