The asymptotic form of the image interaction is derived for a classical external point charge at a distance z 1 outside a periodic metallic surface, generalizing to real metals the analytical result of Lang and Kohn (1973) for jellium. The centre of gravity z c of the induced charge coincides with the position of the image plane z 0 in the limit of linear response. However, whereas z c is shown to depend through non-linear response on the magnitude of the external charge q, z 0 is independent of q. We show that surface periodicity does not modulate z 0 , but adds to the image interaction a periodic component decaying exponentially with z. In addition, the long-ranged effect of non-linearity on the interaction energy is a term attractive to a positive external charge and proportional to q 3 /(z 1 -z 0 ) 4 . We report first-principles pseudopotential calculations of the interaction energy with three aluminium surfaces: (111), (100) and (110). A supercell geometry is used. A discrete classical model without adjustable parameters reproduces the effect of the surface periodicity on the image interaction at each of the three surfaces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Finnis et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: