The chemoreflex and exercise drive to breathe interact with cortically mediated rhythm to maintain constant alveolar ventilation as breathing frequency changes.
May inform ventilatory pattern interpretation in exercise or CO2 challenges; leaves open clinical translation to patient management.
When breathing frequency (f) is imperceptibly increased during a volitionally paced respiratory rhythm imposed by an auditory signal, tidal volume (Vt) decreases such that minute ventilation (Ve) rises according to f-induced dead-space ventilation changes (18). As a result, significant change in alveolar ventilation and Pco(2) are prevented as f varies. The present study was performed to determine what regulatory properties are retained by the respiratory control system, wherein the spontaneous automatic rhythmic activity is replaced by a volitionally paced rhythm. Six volunteers were asked to trigger each breath cycle on hearing a brief auditory signal. The time interval between subsequent auditory signals was imperceptibly changed for 10-15 min, during 1) air breathing (condition 1), 2) the addition of a 300 ml of instrumental dead space (condition 2), 3) an increase in the inspired level of CO(2) (condition 3), and 4) light exercise (condition 4). We found that as f was slowly increased the elaborated Vt decreased in accordance to the background level of CO(2) and metabolic rate. Indeed, for any given breath duration, Vt was shifted upward in condition 2 vs. 1, whereas the slope of Vt changes according to the volitionally rhythm was much steeper in conditions 3 and 4 vs. 1. The resulting changes in Ve offset any f-induced changes in dead-space ventilation in all conditions. We conclude that there is an inherent, fundamental mechanism that elaborates Vt based on f when imposed by the premotor cortex in humans. The chemoreflex and exercise drive to breath interacts with this cortically mediated rhythm maintaining alveolar rather than Ve constant as f changes. The implications of our findings are discussed in the context of our current understanding of the central generation of breathing rhythm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haouzi et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: