Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper seeks to explain the absence of Māori food in the public culinascape. Drawing on the work of Heldke and Hage, I develop an analysis in terms of a politics of palatability. There are few Māori restaurants because there is not a clientele. There is a limited Māori clientele because Māori as a group lack the economic resources to support restaurants and, unlike migrant ethnic groups, have many other sites of community. There is a limited Pākehā clientele because Pākehā do not enjoy Māori food. This dislike of Māori food is, I argue, a social taste, that can be understood in a context where Māori demands for rights on the basis of their indigenous status have disturbed the ways in which Pākehā belong to the nation. Following Harbottle, I argue that Māori have a “spoiled identity” for Pākehā, and that this can be read both as a sign of Māori subordination and as a sign of Māori power. What this analysis suggests is that the public culinascape can be read as a map of the field of race relations in Aotearoa New Zealand.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carolyn Morris (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: