Key result
Endovascular therapy and medical management each achieve clinical recovery in spontaneous internal carotid artery dissection.
Case Report (n=2)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Spontaneous internal carotid artery dissection (ICAD) is a rare disease and an important cause of stroke in young patients. The presentation of ICAD is variable and atypical. We have used three-dimensional T1-weighted volume isotropic turbo spin-echo acquisition to help diagnose ICAD. ICAD should be considered in young patients presenting with relevant symptoms in an emergency setting. We herein report ICAD with an unexplained onset in two patients. Neither had a history of large or small cervical trauma, but both had a history of hypertension. The first patient was a 33-year-old man who presented with upper extremity numbness and mobility impairment, and the second patient was a 40-year-old man with onset of visual impairment. There were no obvious triggers in either case. Both patients were diagnosed with ICAD by blood vessel examination. However, their prognoses differed. The first patient recovered after endovascular therapy, whereas the second patient was successfully managed with medical treatment. ICAD can cause different symptoms depending on where the dissection occurs. Clinicians must be aware of the different clinical manifestations of ICAD, make the correct diagnosis in a timely manner, make appropriate treatment plans according to the patient's condition, and strive for timely recanalization of the blood vessels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2023) conducted a case report in Spontaneous internal carotid artery dissection (ICAD) (n=2). Endovascular therapy or medical treatment was evaluated on Clinical recovery and management outcome. Endovascular therapy and medical management each resulted in clinical recovery in 2 male patients (aged 33 and 40 years) presenting with spontaneous internal carotid artery dissection.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: