Parallel face-to-face arene-arene complexes between benzene and substituted benzenes have been investigated at the MP2(full)/6-311G** and M05-2X/6-311G** levels of theory. A reasonably good correlation was found between the binding energies and the ∑|σ(m)| values of the substituted aromatics. It is proposed that a substituent |σ(m)| value informs on both the aromatic substituent dispersion/polarizability and the effect the substituent has on the aromatic electrostatics. Supporting this hypothesis, a combination of electrostatic (∑σ(m)) and dispersion/polarizability (∑M(r)) substituent constant terms gives an excellent, and statistically significant, correlation with the benzene-substituted benzene binding energy. Symmetry adapted perturbation theory energy decomposition calculations show the dominant attractive force is dispersion; however, the sum of all nonelectrostatic forces is essentially a constant, while the electrostatic component varies significantly. This explains the importance of including an electrostatic term when predicting benzene-substituted benzene binding energies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watt et al. (2011) studied this question.