Key result
Modern glucose-lowering therapy linked to ~33% higher rates of achieving HbA1c target over three decades.
Why the study?
How have glucose-lowering therapies and HbA1c target achievement changed over three decades in patients at high cardiovascular risk?
Observational (n=2,158)
No
How have glucose-lowering therapies and HbA1c target achievement changed over three decades in patients at high cardiovascular risk?
Absolute Event Rate: 69.2% vs 51.9%
p-value: p=< 0.001
Real-world data show a marked shift toward novel glucose-lowering classes like SGLT2 inhibitors and improved HbA1c target achievement over the past three decades in high cardiovascular risk patients.
Aim Over recent years, therapy options and strategies for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have developed substantially. This study investigated glucose‐lowering treatment in patients with high cardiovascular risk over three decades. Materials and Methods A total of 2158 patients undergoing elective coronary angiography at a tertiary care hospital in Europe were included in three sequential observational studies (OS): OS1 (1999–2000; n = 672), OS2 (2005–2008; n = 1005) and OS3 (2022–2023; n = 481). Sociodemographic data, patient‐reported medication, medical histories and blood samples were analysed. Results A clear trend towards more complex glucose‐lowering therapies was found. A wider array of glucose‐lowering drugs was used over time (OS1: 11; OS2: 21; OS3: 25) and the number of different drugs used in combination therapy in a single patient increased to a maximum of five in OS3. Furthermore, substantial differences in applied medication regimens were observed: Sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 inhibitors were the most frequently reported substance class (34.0% of total reported glucose‐lowering drugs) in OS3, whilst metformin remained a key component (OS1: 33.9%; OS2: 41.8%; OS3: 32.0%). Other drug classes like sulfonylureas were largely replaced. A total of 69.2% of patients in OS3 achieved an HbA1c level of < 7% (vs. OS1: 51.9%, OS2: 54.7%; p trend < 0.001). Over 25% of patients with T2DM were newly diagnosed at admission (OS1: 43.8%, OS2: 29.7%, OS3: 27.2%; p trend < 0.001) and had therefore no diabetes‐related medication. Conclusion These real‐world data emphasize a marked shift in T2DM treatment towards novel substance classes. However, the use of incretin mimetics remained low. Significantly more patients reached HbA1c targets in the most recent cohort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
NEYER et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Type 2 diabetes mellitus and high cardiovascular risk (n=2,158). Glucose-lowering therapy vs. Historical cohorts (1999-2000 and 2005-2008) was evaluated on Achievement of HbA1c level < 7% (p=< 0.001). Glucose-lowering therapy shifted towards novel classes over three decades, with 69.2% of patients achieving HbA1c <7% in 2022-2023 compared to 51.9% in 1999-2000 (p trend <0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: