This paper considers the problem of nonpreemptively scheduling n independent jobs on m identical, parallel processors with the object of minimizing the “makespan”, or completion time for the entire set of jobs. Coffman, Garey, and Johnson [SIAM J. Comput., 7 (1978), pp. 1–17] described an algorithm MULTIFIT which has a considerably better worst case performance than the largest processing time first algorithm. In this paper we tighten the bounds obtained in that paper on the worst case behavior of this algorithm by giving an example showing that it may be as bad as 13/11 and proving that it can be no worse than 6/5.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Donald K. Friesen (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: