Background: Pelvic radiotherapy causes tissue atrophy and fibrosis, leading to urinary tract dysfunction. Tissue ischaemia poses a significant surgical challenge. This study examined the urological sequelae of radiotherapy, types of reconstructive urological surgery (RUS) required and functional outcomes.Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all radiotherapy patients who underwent RUS at a tertiary centre between 2007–2017. Details including time from radiotherapy, pre-operative assessments, type of surgery performed and functional outcome were analysed.Results: Fifty-four patients were identified. The primary malignancy was cervical (32), colorectal (9) and other urogenital/metastatic origins in the remaining cases. Mean time between radiation and RUS was 13 years. Sixty-nine reconstructive surgeries were performed. Twenty-two patients had fistulae, but only 27% were closed and 73% ended with urinary diversion. Eighteen had ureteric strictures, with 56% having associated bladder dysfunction. Twelve (67%) patients had RUS, of whom 83% required bowel interposition, and 33% primary diversion. Nine of 24 patients with contracted bladders were reconstructed and eight remain functionally continent. Renal function stabilised or improved in 87%. Nine patients (17%) had Clavien 3 or 4 complications.Conclusions: A variety of complex, major RUS were required. In 61%, urinary diversion was necessary, with radiotherapy fistulae being a particular challenge and closed in only a third. In total, 37% of patients were reconstructed achieving functional continence and restoration of upper-tract drainage with renal function preservation. This surgery was at a cost of a re-intervention rate of 28% and significant morbidity in 17%. RUS in the radiotherapy field should be performed in centres with experience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toia et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: