Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: We investigated current clinical practice of antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) in surgery. METHODS: Survey administration of AMP to patients without co-morbidity or allergy undergoing surgery, among surgeons indexed as corresponding authors for articles published in general surgery, orthopedics, gynecology, and cardiac surgery journals. RESULTS: A total of 1,068 surgeons answered (response rate 68%). Of these, 26.1% do not begin infusion of the first antimicrobial dose within 1 h of incision, as suggested by guidelines, and 27.2% continue administering AMP for two or more days after surgery, including 7.6% who continue for four to seven days, in contradiction to the guidelines. There were significant differences between Europe and North America in the selection of AMP regimens. Furthermore, 19% of Europeans order infusion of the first antimicrobial dose during the incision compared with 3.9% of North Americans; 74.2% of Europeans discontinue AMP within 24 h after surgery compared with 86% of North Americans. Finally, 31% of general surgeons in North America administer supplementary oral prophylaxis for colectomy compared with only 5% of European surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: The AMP strategies in day-to-day self-reported practice differ significantly. Uniform, evidence-based practice is warranted, especially in this era of increasing antimicrobial resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alexiou et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: