Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article is aimed at describing and defining small power status. Definitions can explain either the extensional or intensional meaning of a concept. The intensional way of defining a concept is selected and on this basis the following possible defining characteristics of small powers are explored: low rank, high degree of penetration by environment, a given type of behavior, a distinct role and conflicting interests. The investigation leads to the conclusion that low rank is apparently the most useful, but also the most conventional defining characteristic. For this reason the author suggests that approaches based on the concepts of role and interest are worthy of closer in vestigation and that they may add new dimensions to the study of small powers and their behavior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raimo Väyrynen (1971) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: