The monomer, dimer, and tetramer of methyllithium, (CH 3 Li) n ( n = 1, 2, 4), have been studied with use of density-functional (DFT) and conventional ab initio theory. The energy gain Δ E associated with the formation of (CH 3 −Li) n from n Li • and n CH 3 • radicals is −45.5, −132.7, and −308.6 kcal/mol for n = 1, 2, and 4 using nonlocal density-functionals and a large, doubly polarized triple-ζ STO basis (NL-SCF/TZ2P). The corresponding dimerization and tetramerization energies for methyllithium are −41.7 and −126.6 kcal/mol, respectively. The 298 K heat of formation of CH 3 Li(g) is calculated to be 29.2 kcal/mol, using experimental Δ H f values for CH 3 • (g) and Li • (g). The low-energy lithium 2p orbitals are shown to play an active role in the bonding of the methyllithium aggregates and can be viewed as valence orbitals. A detailed analysis of the carbon−lithium bonding mechanism highlights the significant role of covalent contributions. In CH 3 Li, we find a strongly polar C−Li electron pair bond in which charge is donated from Li 2s to the CH 3 2a 1 SOMO. The covalent character is indicated by 2s ± 2a 1 mixing and a sizable lithium 2p z participation. In (CH 3 Li) 4 the carbon−lithium bond is provided by two distinct orbital interactions: (1) an essentially covalent electron pair bond between the strongly sp hybridized Li−Li and C−C bonding fragment orbitals of the lithium cluster and the methyl cage, respectively, in A 1 symmetry; (2) a strongly polar electron pair bond between the corresponding triply degenerate Li−Li and C−C antibonding fragment orbital sets in T 2 symmetry. The situation is similar for (CH 3 Li) 2 . The electron density is analyzed using atomic charges from the following: (1) the natural population analysis (NPA); (2) the Hirshfeld method; (3) the Mulliken method as well as a modification which we term Modified Mulliken; (4) a scheme which we designate Voronoi deformation density (VDD); the VDD charges monitor the shift of electron density out of ( Q > 0) or into ( Q < 0) the Voronoi cell of an atom upon formation of the molecule from the isolated atoms. The degree of ionicity of the carbon−lithium bond decreases from ca. “50” down to “30%” along CH 3 Li, (CH 3 Li) 2, and (CH 3 Li) 4, according to the Hirshfeld charges. This agrees with a similar trend emerging from the VDD charges as well as with the results of the electronic structure analysis. The NPA charges suggest that the carbon−lithium bond is ca. “90%” ionic and that the degree of ionicity is independent of the size of the aggregate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bickelhaupt et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: