Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the rapidly evolving world of technology, it is crucial to keep track of the progress of digital transformation and its impact on marginalized communities. This study examines Icelandic governmental digital policies through historical discourse analysis, exploring the ways in which digital transformation initiatives are conceptualized within a neoliberal rationality that emphasizes efficiency, competitiveness, and individuality and how this aligns with the rights and needs of disabled people. The analysis reveals that digital policies lack inclusivity and discussion on equitable access. The policies operate within the historical conjuncture of ableism, neoliberal rationality, and human rights, where human rights are subordinate. This highlights significant challenges in incorporating a commitment to human rights within digital transformation, which frequently falls short of addressing the rights and needs of disabled people.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bjarnadóttir et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: