Why the study?
Does oral pyridostigmine bromide reduce the QTc interval in patients with stable coronary artery disease and exercise-induced myocardial ischemia?
Does oral pyridostigmine bromide reduce the QTc interval in patients with stable coronary artery disease and exercise-induced myocardial ischemia?
A single oral dose of pyridostigmine bromide reduces the QTc interval and increases the RR interval in patients with stable coronary artery disease, suggesting potential cardioprotective effects on ventricular repolarization.
Shortens QTc and prolongs RR in stable CAD; extends cholinergic modulation of repolarization and supports outcome trials.
Parasympathetic dysfunction is an independent risk factor in patients with coronary artery disease; thus, cholinergic stimulation is a potential therapeutic measure that may be protective by acting on ventricular repolarization. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effects of pyridostigmine bromide (PYR), a reversible anticholinesterase agent, on the electrocardiographic variables, particularly QTc interval, in patients with stable coronary artery disease. In a randomized double-blind crossover placebo-controlled study, simultaneous 12-lead electrocardiographic tracings were obtained at rest from 10 patients with exercise-induced myocardial ischemia before and 2 h after the oral administration of 45 mg PYR or placebo. PYR increased the RR intervals (pre: 921 +/- 27 ms vs post: 1127 +/- 37 ms; P<0.01) and, in contrast with placebo, decreased the QTc interval (pre: 401 +/- 3 ms vs post: 382 +/- 3 ms; P<0.01). No other electrocardiographic variables were modified (PR segment, QT interval, QT and QTc dispersions). Cholinergic stimulation with PYR caused bradycardia and reduced the QTc interval without important side effects in patients with coronary disease. These effects, if confirmed in studies over longer periods of administration, may suggest a cardioprotection by cholinergic stimulation with PYR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Castro et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: