Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The present study investigated the gender-based differences in EFL reading comprehension in the Iranian EFL context. To illuminate the possible effect of background knowledge, the study focused on a non-text. The non-text was followed by 10 reading comprehension questions. Eight questions focused on the antecedent-reference relationship; one question asked for the topic of the text and one for the main idea. A total of 53 intermediate university students took part in the study. They were indicated to be at the intermediate level of reading proficiency after taking a reading comprehension test. The results indicated that males were more successful in constructing the meaning for the non-text in general and in performing on the three types of items in particular. In other words, they were more successful in dealing with a context of ambiguity. It was concluded that readers compensate for the lack of meaning in a text by making themselves activate a possibly related schemata and as such even meaningless texts will carry meaning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmadi et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: