This study presents a statistically grounded reformulation of the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Curve Number (CN) rainfall-runoff model by replacing the conventional linear initial abstraction (I a ) to retention (S) relationship (I a = λS, where λ is initial abstraction ratio) with a power law-based formulation (I a = S L , where L is gradient of log-log graph) in order to restore mathematical correctness. A nonparametric bias-corrected and accelerated (BCa) bootstrap framework was employed to test the NRCS universal λ = 0.20 assumption, revealing its statistical invalidity (derived optimum λ value at 99% BCa confidence interval: 0.032 - 0.079) for the urban Malaysian catchment studied. The proposed model achieved higher theoretical coherence and improved runoff estimate accuracy while preserving model parsimony. Importantly, it accommodates full rainfall-runoff datasets and dynamically captures catchment saturation-dependent retention behavior, addressing limitations of the conventional CN practices. The newly developed parsimonious two-parameter (S, L) runoff estimation model ensures practical adaptability by enabling catchment specific calibration without resorting to arbitrary CN selection. This study bridges traditional hydrology with modern statistical rigor, offering a scalable, data-driven alternative to conventional CN practices. The findings support a paradigm shift in runoff modelling by demonstrating the potential of nonparametric methods to refine legacy hydrological models and better capture real world nonlinearity and variability under changing climatic conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheong et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: