Why the study?
Despite the medical importance of the myosin-2 family as drug targets, previous structure-activity-relationship studies were limited to a single myosin-2 isoform, preventing chemical optimization from providing a promising lead.
Small substitutions on the blebbistatin scaffold improve functional and pharmacological properties, highlighting their potential for drug development targeting myosin-2.
D-ring substitutions extend blebbistatin SAR across myosin-2 isoforms; leaves open advancement toward cardiac therapeutics.
-aminoblebbistatin (AmBleb) are highly useful tool compounds as they selectively inhibit the ATPase activity of myosin-2 family proteins. Despite the medical importance of the myosin-2 family as drug targets, chemical optimization has not yet provided a promising lead for drug development because previous structure-activity-relationship studies were limited to a single myosin-2 isoform. Here we evaluated the potential of blebbistatin scaffold for drug development and found that D-ring substitutions can fine-tune isoform specificity, absorption-distribution-metabolism-excretion, and toxicological properties. We defined the inhibitory properties of NBleb and AmBleb on seven different myosin-2 isoforms, which revealed an unexpected potential for isoform specific inhibition. We also found that NBleb metabolizes six times slower than blebbistatin and AmBleb in rats, whereas AmBleb metabolizes two times slower than blebbistatin and NBleb in human, and that AmBleb accumulates in muscle tissues. Moreover, mutagenicity was also greatly reduced in case of AmBleb. These results demonstrate that small substitutions have beneficial functional and pharmacological consequences, which highlight the potential of the blebbistatin scaffold for drug development targeting myosin-2 family proteins and delineate a route for defining the chemical properties of further derivatives to be developed. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Small substitutions on the blebbistatin scaffold have beneficial functional and pharmacological consequences, highlighting their potential in drug development targeting myosin-2 family proteins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gyimesi et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: