Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Expert panel consensus was used to develop evidence-based process indicators that were independent risk factors for the main clinical outcome parameters of length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and mortality. In a retrospective, matched data analysis of patients from five ICUs at a tertiary university hospital, agreed process indicators (sedation monitoring, pain monitoring, mean arterial pressure [MAP] >or= 60 mmHg, tidal volume [TV] <or= 6 ml/kg body weight, peak inspiratory pressure [PIP] <or= 35 cmH(2)O and blood glucose [BG] >or= 80 and <or= 130 mg/dl) were validated using a prospective dataset of 4445 consecutive patients. After matching for age, sex and ICU, 634 patients were analysed. Logistic regression of the 634 patients showed that monitoring analgesia and sedation, MAP >or= 60 mmHg and BG >or= 80 mg/dl were relevant for survival. Linear regression of the 634 patients showed that analgesia monitoring, PIP <or= 35 cmH(2)O and TV <or= 6 ml/kg were associated with reduced length of ICU stay. Linear regression on all 4445 patients showed analgesia, sedation monitoring, MAP >or= 60 mmHg, BG >or= 80 mg/dl and <or= 130 mg/dl, PIP <or= 35 cmH(2)O and TV <or= 6 ml/kg were associated with reduced length of ICU stay, indicating that adherence to evidence-based key process indicators may reduce mortality and length of ICU stay.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kastrup et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: